![]() The employer would then be given the power to issue a "work notice" to a trade union, identifying staff who will be required to work, and the work needed to meet the minimum service level. The bill would allow ministers to set minimum service levels during walkouts in the above-mentioned sectors. It has said the legislation is needed to protect the lives and livelihoods of those that may be disrupted by industrial action in key public services. The government brought forward the strikes bill in January in response to months of strikes in the civil service, transport, health, education and elsewhere. Government case for dismissal and fines ‘not compelling’ The committee has called on the government to amend the bill’s “deep flaws” and come back with legislation that “better respects” the protections guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. “This means the bill, in our view, is likely to be incompatible with human rights law which provides a right to association and with it, protection for strike action," she added. The government’s choice of sectors – health, education, fire and rescue, transport, border security and nuclear decommissioning – also risked over-reaching into areas “only tangentially linked to the maintenance of vital public services”, Cherry said. The legislation would require minimum levels of service to be maintained in “critical” public sectors during industrial action, make it easier to sack striking workers and potentially putting unions at risk of £1m fines.īut Joanna Cherry, chair of JCHR, said the government “has not proven that such draconian measures are needed or that the current framework is inadequate.”Īnd she said these “heavy-handed sanctions” are “compounded by vague rules that would leave striking workers and unions in confusion as to whether they had been met or not”. The Joint Committee on Human Rights said the proposed reforms “do not appear to be justified and need to be reconsidered”, in a report published today on the strikes (minimum service level) bill. Government plans to limit strikes by Border Force officials and some other public servants are incompatible with human rights law, MPs and peers have said. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |